Apparently October brought a lot of costume searchers online.  After several months of declining search query volumes, October query volumes ticked up 4% m-o-m. Total web search activity peaked just shy of 13 billion queries in the US.  Among the major market players nearly every engine benefitted from the lift in activity.  However behind the rising tide only one engine managed to pull ahead of the pack.

Octover 2009 Search Market Share and Volume

Google saw a 5.6% m-o-m lift in query volumes driving Google’s market share up a full point to 73.6%.  Despite the efforts of the other players, the “Google habit” appears to be growing to new record heights.  Every other major player lost market share despite showing strong volume lifts of their own.  Bing posted the second strongest gains in volume with market share essentially remaining flat.  The only top engine to show a decline in volume was Ask which continues to ride the perpetual roller coaster of search share.

As noted above, the queries included in the market share calculations are web search only, not including search queries performed in other dedicated search categories such as maps, travel, shopping. In the coming months, Compete will expand the reporting to include these vertical section queries into the overall market share numbers. This comes as engines such as Bing focus their efforts on improving the vertical search experience. We shall see how this impacts the numbers and whether this has any impact on the “Google habit”.

Octover 2009 Search Trends

The major takeaways for October 2009 ….

  • Google reaches a new record market share of 73.6% on 5.6% in volume gains
  • Yahoo! continues its slide dropping almost a ½ point in share despite volume gains
  • Bing held market share nearly steady with a very slight 0.1ppt loss on the second strongest volume gains
  • Ask dropped almost a full point and held the dubious distinction of posting the only volume loss and a sharp one at that.
  • AOL held steady on a modest near market tracking volume gain

* Search market share includes web search only for the Adult US Online Population and is calculated based on unique queries within each session during the given month.

Share - Save - E-mail


Analyze more domains: + +

Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.

Link to This Post:     


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.
  1. Buzzlord

    Interesting, I would think that Bing would be getting some of Yahoo’s market share, but maybe that will be a slower process than I thought.

    I don’t get the line graph — what is that telling is? How do we read that? Is it a percentage of their percentage market share?

  2. Simon

    Buzzlord,

    The line graph is a 100 base index to a point in time (in this case October 2008). The trend line for each engine shows its relative market share growth over the past year.

  3. RFI Studios - The Google vs. Microsoft Cold War? - Left Brain

    [...] of such a deal is a huge loss of traffic for any property that excludes Google.  According to Compete, Google holds 73% of the search market share.  Excluding that traffic would obviously lead to [...]

  4. air jordan

    Thank you! I was attracted when saw the air jordan men

  5. funky

    This is a test message klsflaskfjlksjfl;skdjfl fdsflsdjflksdflsa sdfsdff dksfj lskf lksdjlsklksdfjlds dlk dskflkdsflksf sakfjlsakjflsfj as kfsldkfjskjf sdlfjljfl lkjkjkj aflkjsdfljldskjf lksdjfkfjlksdjf aslkjflksdjf slaak lkdfksafjk a kafdsfjlkdsfjldskjlsad salkfjasdfksdlf;slk alkfjdaslfj a;slkjflasf akjfldkjflkasjflkas d al;kjlakfjasirupoweir;lsadf akdflksajfl sdafjlaskja akljflksdfjlkjasdlkf klsksflasjkfsaldjsa lkakfasdflksaflkasj alkjflsakf aslakjfals fla;skjlas fl;akflkdsajflkjf;l a;lk l;dfsjlakfj aflaskj kdsjfal;skfj asjdf ;laskjas lfjdlasdflas f;lk l l fdsfl;kajflkasjdlfkjaslkfal lkajflkafj aalk flkdsjflaskdflkasjdflkasfjlkjf klfjaskfas lk kdsjlasdfjlasfj asdfjkas lakjalkjlkjlkaja alkajlkaj a alkajalkja alkajfd flksda aljaaj alkjfalskdjf askfj akl kjfdslkasjdflkasjdf aalkjalkjf ldskjflaskjdf asd flsdkjfkdjflksdjfklsdjf dsfaslkfjasdlfjaslkj akasljfsalkfjsldkfjlksj akjalkjalkaj akjalkjalkja kajflkasjdfl sadfkja flkdjflksajflksjdf skfjlksdjf sdkj sldkfjls fdlkfjdsla lkdsfjladsfjslkfj dsalflsadfjlsadfjl dsdfjlksfjslkdfjdslkjflskadjfl lkdsfjlkasjf askfjlksdjf kfjslkdfj sdiweqruwqurwruwu fldflsd


Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Latest Blog Posts:


Feb 9: Truth in Engineering… and Marketing
Feb 8: Doppelganger Week Turns To Urban Dictionary
Feb 5: The Role of Search in the Online Deposits Market
Feb 4: Conan vs. Leno: Coco Must Go
Feb 3: Oscar Mayer Brings Good Mood
Feb 2: Compete Ranks December’s Top Food and Cooking Sites
Feb 1: Travel Industry Rebound Based on Site Traffic: The Other Side of the Coin
Jan 29: The Nexus One – Google’s Next (But Likely Not Final) Frontier
Jan 29: Search is Integral to Driving a Wave of Cruise Bookings
Jan 28: Compete’s CMO on Audience Insights, Not Audience Measurement
Jan 27: Consumers Slow to Embrace Social Media As Shopping Resource
Jan 26: Online Food Fight: Scripps vs. Cablevision
Jan 25: List of Top 50 Websites in December 2009
Jan 22: Setting My Sights on Site-to-Store
Jan 21: Compete Now Offers Audience Insights!
Jan 14: Can shipping costs affect online sales?
Jan 11: My 10 year MSN Hotmail anniversary and what it means to Gmail
Jan 8: World War 3G
Jan 7: A look under the hood of Ad Impact
Jan 5: Smartphone Owners Now Spending More from Handset, but Poor Site Functionality Is a Turn-off