With Help from Media, Twitter Overtakes Google as Leading Search Engine for “Iran+Election”
Written by Alex Patriquin (contact - e-mail) -- June 25th, 2009 | Share - Save - E-mailLast week’s craze over Twitter and Iran was the height of media buzzdom. Democracy + social media + possible election fraud = PR Gold. The State Department asking Twitter to delay server maintenance? A former National Security Advisor honcho suggesting Twitter should get the Nobel Prize?! That’s so good, even the craziest novelist couldn’t make it up.
But what was really happening in Iran and on Twitter? Some sobering thoughts suggest that Twitter may not have been that widely embraced inside Iran. Other reports suggest that the government has been actively suppressing digital resistance.
Meanwhile, a few terrifying and sad reports have leaked out, like protest violence photos and the Neda video, displaying the immediacy and emotional impact of social media.
Outside Iran, these scant bits have whipped the disenfranchised Diaspora and simpatico millions to take to the streets and social media streams. Starved for the latest and eager to commune, they have pollinated the web with millions of bits of Iran Election information – on leading search engines, news sites, wikis, social networks, sharing services and real time search engines.
Taking a web-wide view, Compete looked at searchers on “Iran+Election” at over 25 sites like Google, the New York Times, Wikipedia, Facebook, YouTube, real-time search startup OneRiot and, of course, Twitter.
It’s no surprise that Twitter claimed 55% of searchers the week after the Election, given all the media hoopla. But note that Google was the leading search property in the days leading up to the event, the day itself and the day after. Searchers used Google to learn more about the event before it happened and Twitter to get the latest on the fallout.
As OneRiot has written about, there’s a bit of an outstanding question among Google, Twitter and others: who will win real time search?
Search doesn’t equate to media consumption. With Iran in the headlines on nytimes.com and streaming down Twitter apps as #IranElection, people don’t need to search for the latest. But many will search nonetheless, especially the highly engaged.
Did you like that post? You'll love these.
Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.
Link to This Post:
Get the 
June 26th, 2009 at 2:44 am
Democracy + social media + possible election fraud = PR Gold. it’s very right
June 27th, 2009 at 9:42 am
What with the media coverage of twitter’s central role, and the state dept request and all, couldn’t have been any better, from a PR angle. Course, the fact that lives were at stake makes it a bigger issue, but it does mean citizen reporting via twitter is filling an information vacuum which MSM journalists couldn’t fill. That’s huge.
July 1st, 2009 at 5:08 am
It means now the nesw can sperated via many tips: google twitter blog social media and so on.
July 24th, 2009 at 5:20 am
Hey thanks for this news. Really useful
August 4th, 2009 at 6:40 am
Nice info!
November 26th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Thank you for your article!you should keep a happy ed hardy high boots mood
December 11th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
[...] attention drove Twitter’s share of searchers on the Iran Election to record heights two weeks ago. A barrage of mainstream media and blogosphere chatter swarmed the [...]
December 15th, 2009 at 10:17 am
Twitter may overtake google, it’s getting famous thanks for information though!