Earth Day 2009 was a couple of weeks ago now, but the buzz around “going green” is still alive and well. Last week I counted that, during a commercial break from ‘My Name is Earl,’ 4 of the 5 ads I saw contained a green message or promotion.

In online advertising too, we at Compete have seen companies embrace green advertising across the board. All four major wireless carriers are currently heavily promoting paperless billing initiatives (my personal favorite: att-satisfaction.com). Motorola took going green one step further this year by introducing the Renew, a new cell phone made of recycled materials that uses sustainable manufacturing practices. When it launched, the Renew captured 6% of T-Mobile’s total handset interest, which is more than double that of the average T-Mobile handset at its price point. Still, most corporations have historically claimed that changing materials, manufacturing routines and shipping practices is too expensive and doesn’t add value for consumers. So what is changing? Why are companies starting to embrace going green?

It turns out that companies may not have to make a choice between helping the environment and increasing profits after all. As part of our quarterly Online Channel Effectiveness product, Compete surveyed over 900 wireless shoppers and asked them about their shopping and buying patterns. With regards to green products, we asked survey takers if they would be willing to pay more for consumer electronics products that were “green.”

As you can see, 59% of shoppers told us that they would be willing to pay extra for green CE products, and 10% offered to pay 50%+ more. Moreover, this survey was conducted during Q1, when most respondents were likely weighing the weak economy and their own economic circumstances in their answer to this question. You might be thinking, “but wait, everyone says they want to be green, but nobody actually pays for it”. Well, even if half of this 59% spends just an extra $1 on their next cell phone, companies would generate an extra $32M annually (roughly 30B cell phones are sold in the US every quarter).

So how can companies capitalize on this desire to go green? Appealing to consumers’ desire to be environmentally-friendly and save money are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Marketers have been successful at getting shoppers to pay more for environmentally-friendly products by clearly articulating what other savings the customer gets that should offset the higher purchase price. For example, high-rated Energy Star appliances typically cost a premium over comparable items but earn that money back in reduced utility usage. Similarly, replacing household light bulbs with compact fluorescent ones saves both electricity and having to replace the bulbs every year or so.

And that’s not just good for the environment – that’s good for business!

Share - Save - E-mail


Analyze more domains: + +

Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.

Link to This Post:     


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.
  1. nfl football clothing

    I think i am the guy who don’t pay.because money is hard to earn.

  2. Ling

    Even so, I believe getting customers to pay more because they want to be green is not really a viable business strategy. It means that you’re punishing people for being good. Proper strategy would be to pour money into research, to figure out how to go green without having to pass the tab on to customers.

  3. Rashad Electric Electrical Engineering Zoon

    Nice and Great Post. this sharing is more important for knowledge increasing. thanks

  4. kari

    wow, cool. Thank you!

  5. Marlene Affeld

    Marlene Affeld

  6. Sheepskin UGG boots

    you can buy the kids ugg kid boots.And may be you like theugg anniversary.


Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Latest Blog Posts:


Feb 9: Truth in Engineering… and Marketing
Feb 8: Doppelganger Week Turns To Urban Dictionary
Feb 5: The Role of Search in the Online Deposits Market
Feb 4: Conan vs. Leno: Coco Must Go
Feb 3: Oscar Mayer Brings Good Mood
Feb 2: Compete Ranks December’s Top Food and Cooking Sites
Feb 1: Travel Industry Rebound Based on Site Traffic: The Other Side of the Coin
Jan 29: The Nexus One – Google’s Next (But Likely Not Final) Frontier
Jan 29: Search is Integral to Driving a Wave of Cruise Bookings
Jan 28: Compete’s CMO on Audience Insights, Not Audience Measurement
Jan 27: Consumers Slow to Embrace Social Media As Shopping Resource
Jan 26: Online Food Fight: Scripps vs. Cablevision
Jan 25: List of Top 50 Websites in December 2009
Jan 22: Setting My Sights on Site-to-Store
Jan 21: Compete Now Offers Audience Insights!
Jan 14: Can shipping costs affect online sales?
Jan 11: My 10 year MSN Hotmail anniversary and what it means to Gmail
Jan 8: World War 3G
Jan 7: A look under the hood of Ad Impact
Jan 5: Smartphone Owners Now Spending More from Handset, but Poor Site Functionality Is a Turn-off