If you’ve visited the homepages of Yahoo!, AOL or MSN in the past couple of months, you may have noticed some really big banner ads. The online publishing industry has been experimenting with new ad sizes and formats lately, and it’s led to some very eye catching advertising.

On the left is the ubiquitous “Medium Regular” banner ad that Kohl’s ran on the MSN homepage. On the right is the same ad, which ran on AOL in larger format.

As you might expect the larger ad got many more clickthroughs, even as a percentage of visitors who saw the ad. But so what? Kohl’s doesn’t want to sell page views to people who see their ads, they want to sell blenders. And that’s where the story gets interesting. You might not expect it, but the small ad actually performed 1.7 percentage points better in driving purchase.

Perhaps that’s not surprising because once someone clicked through either ad, they ended up on the same landing page. In other words, the larger ad drew the attention of more would-be shoppers, but the smaller ad found a greater concentration of motivated buyers.

Which ad size worked better? That depends on Kohl’s objective – were they after attention or conversion? Both ads demonstrated strength.

To speak with a sales representative about Compete’s Ad Impact post-buy analysis and advertising effectiveness studies, visit compete.com/adimpact or email adimpact@compete.com.

To read up on the latest trends in advertising effectiveness, visit blog.compete.com/adimpact.

Share - Save - E-mail


Analyze more domains: + +

Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.

Link to This Post:     


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.
  1. Ling

    Would have really made this comparison interesting if we could have known about the actual number of click-thru’s and conversions for the same number of page views for both ads. I mean, what’s it matter if the conversion rate for the bigger ad is less, if more people click-thru and end of the day – it results in more conversions than the smaller ad.

  2. Suzya

    I think this study is very interesting but not as enlightening as the post makes it out to be. Not only did Kohl’s not test the same type of ad but the ads were shown on two different sites. The target markets for AOL and MSN, although not hugely different do have some key differences that would account for the difference performance of each ad. Also the ad that was posted on AOL is in the format of an equation, where the smaller one is actually just showing boxes with the “things” you can apply to the original price to get the sale price. However it is not an equation like the AOL ad.

    I believe because of the inconsistencies in the ads and target markets on the two sites this test is actually showing that AOL users will click on the large ads but won’t necessarily buy and MSN users tend to move forward to purchase what they click on. This is also up for debate as it is only one ad. Maybe there needs to be a study on how different users on different sites deal with different ads.

  3. Jamie Allsop

    Looking at this from a design point of view. I don’t really thing it matters what size the ad is, I thing it comes down to the design of the ad and whether or not it attracts your attention. If the design of the small ad is better than the design of the bigger ad, then I think more people will be inclined to click on the smaller ad as it attracts there attention more than the bigger ad.

  4. Brison

    I agree with Jamie Allsop. The blender is more prominent in the smaller ad AND the sale price is better positioned.

    The readers naturally would read the ad from left to right…. thus the smaller ad. The larger ad requires the reader to view the ad in a column from top to botton. Viewing left to right allows for instant comprehension.

  5. Rashad Electric Electrical Engineering Zoon

    Nice And Great Post. Thanks For Sharing.

  6. Вячеслав Меньшиков

    Что то Автор почти совсем перестал писать посты и даже админить блог? Может что случилось?

  7. Андрей Сенников

    Благодарю за информацию, буду юзать. :)

  8. OIO Publisher Coupon

    It’s a fact that larger ads are developing ad blindness with the web users. However, they are still going for bigger and bigger ad sizes as screen sizes grow.

  9. PsyMonk

    Спасибочки, что просветили. Никогда бы не подумал :)

  10. Sheepskin UGG boots

    you can buy the kids ugg kid boots.And may be you like theugg anniversary.

  11. Office 2007 Professional

    Very good article very nice sharing


Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Latest Blog Posts:


Mar 12: Automotive Leads Are Not Always a Leading Sales Indicator
Mar 12: Smartphone Owners: A Ready and Willing Audience
Mar 10: Lost Bookings Where Are You?
Mar 10: Do You Groupon?
Mar 8: Join Compete and CTIA at Mobile Marketing & Advertising special session during CTIA Wireless 2010
Mar 5: House of Blues Boston: Traffic Analysis of the World’s Most Popular Club
Mar 4: There’s a Plan for That
Mar 3: Four Reasons Marketers Need a Panel to do Attribution Modeling
Mar 3: Compete Meets Omniture – New Integration Announced
Mar 2: Even Brand Marketers Need to Take Behavioral Data into Account
Mar 1: Who Else Wants Free Pancakes?
Feb 25: Race to the Finish: NBC Stakes its Claim to the Olympics Online
Feb 24: Compete Ranks Top Sites for January 2010
Feb 24: Newcomers up for Tough Competition in the Agent Space
Feb 22: Online Shopper Intelligence Study Released
Feb 19: Sears: Leading Retailer, Brand or Both?
Feb 18: People Love Free Pants!
Feb 17: We’re Number Two! Facebook moves up one big spot in the charts
Feb 16: January Fast Movers
Feb 15: Study Finds Link Between Brand Building and Search