<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Dynamic Ads More Effective?</title>
	<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/</link>
	<description>web insights powered by over 2 million U.S. online consumers</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gul</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1251739</link>
		<dc:creator>gul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1251739</guid>
		<description>your article is good...thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your article is good&#8230;thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghd Hair Straightener</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1240894</link>
		<dc:creator>ghd Hair Straightener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1240894</guid>
		<description>Your article was very well written, I am very like it, I wish you happy every day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article was very well written, I am very like it, I wish you happy every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Allsop</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1235938</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Allsop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1235938</guid>
		<description>I agree with the Jay, this would have been more effective if the 2 ads were tested on the same site on different days. As people who visit Yahoo will be different to those who visit MSN, so you need to take into account which site would be best for attracting your target audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the Jay, this would have been more effective if the 2 ads were tested on the same site on different days. As people who visit Yahoo will be different to those who visit MSN, so you need to take into account which site would be best for attracting your target audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1137368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1137368</guid>
		<description>Aren't you comparing apples to oranges. Your conclusion would have been more effective if both ad formats (flash and interactive) for tested on the same site not different sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t you comparing apples to oranges. Your conclusion would have been more effective if both ad formats (flash and interactive) for tested on the same site not different sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waseem Qamar</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1109234</link>
		<dc:creator>Waseem Qamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1109234</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the sharing good information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the sharing good information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacBizz</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1054745</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1054745</guid>
		<description>Do you think it would help me in advertising my international online business?

http://www.freedom.ws/macbizz

I can use all the help I can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think it would help me in advertising my international online business?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freedom.ws/macbizz" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedom.ws/macbizz</a></p>
<p>I can use all the help I can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Waring</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1050699</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Waring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1050699</guid>
		<description>I think this is a great case, but I don't think this is an accurate comparison. Browsers on MSN are inherently different than those who browse Yahoo. This could certainly affect the tested rates, causing skewness in the data. Why didn't you test 2 ad variations on 1 site?
Thanks in advance,
Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a great case, but I don&#8217;t think this is an accurate comparison. Browsers on MSN are inherently different than those who browse Yahoo. This could certainly affect the tested rates, causing skewness in the data. Why didn&#8217;t you test 2 ad variations on 1 site?<br />
Thanks in advance,<br />
Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1047218</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1047218</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Paul, for your post. We're excited about the prospects of adaptive ad serving, too -- it finally seems to be a legitimate option for advertisers after years of wishing for it, and we're hoping to examine it in detail soon. In this post, read "dynamic" with a small 'd' and we hope you can forgive our choice of a word that has other meanings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Paul, for your post. We&#8217;re excited about the prospects of adaptive ad serving, too &#8212; it finally seems to be a legitimate option for advertisers after years of wishing for it, and we&#8217;re hoping to examine it in detail soon. In this post, read &#8220;dynamic&#8221; with a small &#8216;d&#8217; and we hope you can forgive our choice of a word that has other meanings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Knegten</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1046391</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Knegten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1046391</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this really is a question about Dynamic Ads -- "visually dynamic" and "animated" does not a Dynamic Ad make. Dynamic Ads are ads that change offers, visual elements, etc. based upon performance, context, behavior or the like. There are a few companies doing this, including Dapper, Turmi, Teracent, Yahoo, Google, and it's a compelling technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this really is a question about Dynamic Ads &#8212; &#8220;visually dynamic&#8221; and &#8220;animated&#8221; does not a Dynamic Ad make. Dynamic Ads are ads that change offers, visual elements, etc. based upon performance, context, behavior or the like. There are a few companies doing this, including Dapper, Turmi, Teracent, Yahoo, Google, and it&#8217;s a compelling technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Culbertson</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1046122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Culbertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1046122</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this information, but I am curious. What technology did you use for the "interactive" ad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this information, but I am curious. What technology did you use for the &#8220;interactive&#8221; ad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1045452</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2009/04/30/online-flash-interactive-ad-performance/#comment-1045452</guid>
		<description>Yea, I would expect behavioral targeted ads to be performing better, since you are showing what the visitors want. I am curious to know what kind of ads will perform better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I would expect behavioral targeted ads to be performing better, since you are showing what the visitors want. I am curious to know what kind of ads will perform better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
