Is BCS Backlash Hurting or Helping College Football?
Written by Randy Bird (contact - e-mail) -- January 8th, 2009 |
Share - Save - E-mail
The 2008 college football season comes to a close tonight as Oklahoma and Florida face off in the BCS National Championship Game. As usual, the only major sport that has no playoff system has followed up a thrilling season with a seemingly arbitrary matchup, leaving several equally deserving teams out of the running for the championship. The Bowl Championship Series uses a combination of “Top 25” polls and so-called “computer rankings” that grade teams on factors such as strength of schedule, quality of wins, etc. to determine the two teams that will compete in the title game. Rarely does the college football community agree on who the two best teams are, and of the 11 seasons of the BCS, seven have ended with disagreement over who should play for the title: Florida State/Miami in 2000, Colorado/Nebraska/Oregon in 2001, LSU/Oklahoma/USC in 2003, Auburn/LSU/USC in 2004, Florida/Michigan in 2006, Georgia/Ohio State/LSU/Oklahoma/Virginia Tech in 2007, and now Florida/Oklahoma/Texas/USC/Utah in 2008.
In each of these years, angry pundits and fans – particularly fans of those schools left out of the title game – condemn the BCS as an unjust, biased system that fails to achieve its most basic objective of determining a true “best team” in college football. Despite all this, the BCS lands one major TV contract after another. Fox picked up broadcast rights in 2006, and ESPN recently inked a deal worth 50% more than Fox’s, which will start with the 2010 season. On the surface, the TV deals sound outrageous to fans, given the unpopularity of the current system. But have the BCS’s problems translated into problems for the sport in general?
Hardly. For all the controversy it creates, the BCS certainly knows how to spark a good conversation, and all the arguing over which one-loss team is better than all the other one-loss teams has only served to put more eyeballs in front of the TV and in front of the computer during the season.
Whether in spite of, because of, or irrespective of the BCS, online interest in the college football season has continued to rise year after year. FoxSports.com has seen substantial growth in its college-football viewership since Fox began its partnership with the BCS in 2006, despite the TV network’s dearth of regular-season broadcasts. The ESPN brand is obviously the most recognizable in the sports landscape, and their season-long TV, radio, and magazine coverage has naturally contributed to ESPN.com’s growth in recent years. But the biggest gainer has been Yahoo! Sports – the true leader in sports on the web – which has actually doubled its college football traffic in the past four years, thanks in part to its acquisition last year of Rivals.com, a top source for college sports and recruiting news.
Each new season generates a new controversy, and each new controversy generates more traffic across the interwebs. ESPN’s new deal to keep this horrible system festering for four more years will likely ensure that all those angry eyeballs stay tuned. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to prepare to curse this system for the entire four-hour telecast tonight that I will, of course, watch intently
Did you like that post? You'll love these.
Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.
Link to This Post:
Get the 
January 8th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Surely the increase in internet usage over the past four years has played some role. It seems highly unlikely that, despite the age of the BCS system, the past few years have seen a 20% increase in college football interest.
Account for the increase in internet usage since 2005 (around 40%), and you’ll find that the relative interest in the BCS has actually gone DOWN since then.
January 8th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Then again, I may be biased since I hate the BCS ;)
January 9th, 2009 at 1:52 am
A controversy over rules might be good for stimulating conversation and interest before the games, but the actual viewership depends on who’s playing. If your favorite team gets kicked out due to flaky rules, you’re hardly likely to continue watching.
January 9th, 2009 at 11:16 am
My team played (USC) and I caught the tail end of the Utah game. I “boycotted” all commercials and I could care less about and did not watch any of the other games. Florida/Oklahoma was over before it started and was a lame matchup. Had there been a playoff, I probably would have watched every game to see who might play my team. We now have pointless bowls being hosted in *Canada* and viewership for these lesser bowls has to be declining as they get more obtuse. The real money is in TV ads and just imagine what viewership would be like if we had a playoff system where every game matters…
What is interesting about these polls is Yahoo! is the champion of anti-BCS articles and pro-playoff ones – ESPN is losing its edge and so is the system they support.
March 28th, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I’v just started to learn this language ;)
See you!
Your, Raiul Baztepo
April 7th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
Hi !!!! :)
My name is Piter Kokoniz. oOnly want to tell, that your blog is really cool
And want to ask you: what was the reasson for you to start this blog?
Sorry for my bad english:)
Thank you!
Piter Kokoniz, from Latvia
April 13th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Thanks for share
April 14th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
thank you share
May 19th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
hi, msj 103 wonderful blog 103 share