<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is More Efficient: GM, Chrysler or Ford?</title>
	<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/</link>
	<description>web insights powered by over 2 million U.S. online consumers</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dvorikis</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1265810</link>
		<dc:creator>dvorikis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1265810</guid>
		<description>Не могу согласиться с Вами, а если быть честным, то видел уже с десяток разных вариантов этой темы</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Не могу согласиться с Вами, а если быть честным, то видел уже с десяток разных вариантов этой темы</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merdiven</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1250589</link>
		<dc:creator>merdiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1250589</guid>
		<description>Hi, We have been manufacturing stair. 89 merdivenci 89</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, We have been manufacturing stair. 89 merdivenci 89</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassan</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1246471</link>
		<dc:creator>bassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1246471</guid>
		<description>hi, my name is basan.com.tr BASSAN loadcell.your wonderful blog, 41 blog. tnx. Msj number . 41</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, my name is basan.com.tr BASSAN loadcell.your wonderful blog, 41 blog. tnx. Msj number . 41</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassan</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1246446</link>
		<dc:creator>bassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1246446</guid>
		<description>hi, my name is bassan.your wonderful blog, 41 blog. tnx. Msj number . 41</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, my name is bassan.your wonderful blog, 41 blog. tnx. Msj number . 41</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassan</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1246317</link>
		<dc:creator>bassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1246317</guid>
		<description>hi, my name is bassan.your wonderful 41 blog. tnx. Msj number . 41</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, my name is bassan.your wonderful 41 blog. tnx. Msj number . 41</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassan</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1071720</link>
		<dc:creator>bassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1071720</guid>
		<description>hi, msj 89 wonderful blog 89 share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, msj 89 wonderful blog 89 share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELD DANISMANLIK</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1028458</link>
		<dc:creator>ELD DANISMANLIK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1028458</guid>
		<description>wonderful blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iso 9001</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1027307</link>
		<dc:creator>iso 9001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1027307</guid>
		<description>very nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELD.com.tr</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1021576</link>
		<dc:creator>ELD.com.tr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1021576</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1013939</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-1013939</guid>
		<description>Ford is a good car :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is a good car :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-918292</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-918292</guid>
		<description>These are very interesting numbers to see. I would not picture Mercury to be on the low end at all. I think that Hummer number will surely be rising for next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are very interesting numbers to see. I would not picture Mercury to be on the low end at all. I think that Hummer number will surely be rising for next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Party</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-917640</link>
		<dc:creator>Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-917640</guid>
		<description>Автор как всегда написал все понятно :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Автор как всегда написал все понятно :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-916938</link>
		<dc:creator>Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-916938</guid>
		<description>Конкурс для блоггеров от DRUGREVENUE с призовым фондом в 3000 долларов, спешите</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Конкурс для блоггеров от DRUGREVENUE с призовым фондом в 3000 долларов, спешите</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-915779</link>
		<dc:creator>David Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-915779</guid>
		<description>For the top chart, it is somewhat misleading. Your point is a great one, but when you don't start the base at 0 for something like this, you're only making the picture murkier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the top chart, it is somewhat misleading. Your point is a great one, but when you don&#8217;t start the base at 0 for something like this, you&#8217;re only making the picture murkier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ling</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-915270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-915270</guid>
		<description>Their main albatross is the health care and retiree benefit committments. Unless they can get that out of the way, there isn't much they can do to improve their bottomline. At least not under present circumstances. Of course, if the economy turns around, and car sales go up, a little less profit hardly matters, so long as they're making a profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their main albatross is the health care and retiree benefit committments. Unless they can get that out of the way, there isn&#8217;t much they can do to improve their bottomline. At least not under present circumstances. Of course, if the economy turns around, and car sales go up, a little less profit hardly matters, so long as they&#8217;re making a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-914613</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.compete.com/2008/12/19/auto-ad-spend-efficiency-ford-gm-chrysler/#comment-914613</guid>
		<description>great post...lots of good insight here. I love the content you produce from your data. This is how to market today. Be the content producer and broadcaster, don't rely on media. I'll keep reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post&#8230;lots of good insight here. I love the content you produce from your data. This is how to market today. Be the content producer and broadcaster, don&#8217;t rely on media. I&#8217;ll keep reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
