The rising cost of gasoline has become a problem for many people who drive to work every day, or even drive in general, for that matter. Everyone talks about doing something about it, but is it actually having an effect on people? In order to find out, the top fifty public transportation website domains were taken from the “Bus and Train” category, sites such as amtrak.com, greyhound.com, and the ever-popular fungwahbus.com, where you can book a Chinatown bus from Boston to New York for only fifteen dollars. The number of weekly unique visitors (UVs) to these sites were found for the first 27 full weeks of 2008, from January 6th to July 12th, and compared to the average gas price in the United States for each week.

Several portions of the data seemed very interesting:

  • At first glance, one might think it was odd that the UV count actually decreased through January, but upon getting a closer look, it turns out that gas prices fell slightly that month, as well, dipping back under $3.00 and in turn inspiring more people to drive.
  • One of the more notable occurrences is the huge UV spike in Week 6. Week 6 covers February 10-16, so with Valentine’s Day being the 14th and President’s Day being the following Monday, February 18th, its obvious why so many people were looking to take a bus or train that weekend. Not to mention that gas had just jumped back over the $3.00 mark.
  • Throughout April and May the relation seems very close, until gas passes $4.00 per gallon in Week 23, causing a small jump in public transportation UV count.

The most compelling sign of the correlation between gas prices and use of public transportation would be the aptly-named “correlation coefficient,” which indicates the strength of a linear relationship between two variables, falling somewhere between 1 and -1. For example, a correlation coefficient of 1.00 would mean that the two sets of data were exactly the same, and a correlation coefficient of –1.00 would mean that the data sets are exactly opposite. When comparing these particular two sets of data, the correlation coefficient between them was found to be an astonishing 0.9725! So there is a direct correlation; people are responding and actively doing something about gas prices. It makes you wonder why, in places like Rhode Island, they are talking about cutting the daily number of buses running because they aren’t fuel-efficient and gas is too pricy. With demand for buses up, cutting them would just put more drivers on the road and waste even more gas.

You have to wonder though; will people continue to react so directly to the increase in gas prices? It is interesting to note that in the first two weeks of July, the UV count begins to drop. Could this be because people have become used to paying over $4.00 for a gallon of gas and are starting to accept it? In my experience, this is unfortunately true.


Analyze more domains: + +

Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.

Link to This Post:     


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.
  1. Nick Stamoulis

    Great finds! We especially love that you mentioned the Fung Wah Bus…that bus line is classic!

  2. Ling

    Sorry, but my eyes started glazing over after reading that correlation coefficient thing. :) You gotta add in sites like BoltBus.com to the mix. This company offers bus rides between Boston & New York, and Washington DC and New York for $1 + (depends on bookings or something like that). Point is, its sites like these that are drawing all the people who are worried about traveling costs and trying to find cheap public transportation.


Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Latest Blog Posts:


Oct 10: Do Consumers Only Have Eyes for the iPhone?
Oct 9: Slow Back-to-School Season for both Wal-Mart and Target, but Strong in Electronics, Apparel
Oct 8: How Effective Are Online Financial Tools?
Oct 7: Travel Search: Hotwire Heating Up in Demographic Segment Performance
Oct 6: Boxing vs MMA: Which Sport Are Fight Fans Turning To?
Oct 3: Who is the New #1 in the Banking Industry?
Oct 2: Homepage Showdown: Quality of Clicks from the Web’s Biggest Billboards
Oct 1: A New Crop of Smartphones – Something for Everyone?
Sep 30: Are Your Financials Minty Fresh?
Sep 29: QWERTY and Touchscreen: Better Together?
Sep 26: Why BankRate is so (G)RATE
Sep 25: Accountable Advertising on the Internet: A unique perspective from Avinash Kaushik
Sep 24: Compete PRO now has Referral Analytics!
Sep 23: August Online Video Market Share: Politics and the Olympics Take the Top 5 by Storm
Sep 22: Will Consumers Flip for the Newest Member of the BlackBerry Family?
Sep 19: August Search Market Share Update: Rivals Cede to Google’s Lead
Sep 18: Is the iPod Touch Really an iPod?
Sep 17: Lipstick Happens: McCain’s VP Pick Shakes up the Race, Online Too
Sep 16: Happy Birthday GM! Your Present? Volt’s Apparent Success!
Sep 15: Do Any Financial Services Marketers Really Do a Good Job in Marketing to Their Customers?