Comments on: Social Addicts: How do Hardcore Facebook, MySpace and Twitter users differ?

By: sikiş

sikiş — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:41:14 +0000

Hello Webmaster Very nice article! Thanks for this!..

By: Alex

Alex — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:05:39 +0000

For one, all of them lead to one heck of WASTED time, people spend hours/day on these things! I’m addicted to twitter, replaced myspace/facebook with a nice cestagi profile … i’m done with social time wasting :)

By: merdiven

merdiven — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:46:37 +0000

Hi, We have been manufacturing stair. 376 merdivenci 376

By: bassan loadcell

bassan loadcell — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:37:58 +0000

hi, my name is basan.com.tr BASSAN loadcell.your wonderful blog, 219 blog. tnx. Msj number . 219

By: Web Site Developers New York

Web Site Developers New York — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:54:32 +0000

Great work. Thanks for sharing this informative post.

By: bassan

bassan — Tue, 19 May 2009 18:47:51 +0000

hi, msj 316 wonderful blog 316 share

By: tybeachence

tybeachence — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:09:18 +0000

sextir.com is a free porn site - We provide the world with free: porn videos,porn movies,xxx free movies,free porn,free sex.
Best porn hub and tube on the web

By: Mr. Sustainable

Mr. Sustainable — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:43:54 +0000

Insightful! I wonder how the viewership numbers would have differed if each site had 99.99% uptime? I know that it would affect my usage!

By: gaeyia

gaeyia — Tue, 13 May 2008 22:55:25 +0000

Hi Max!

I just (indirectly) referred to this post and after coming back for more, I realized you wrote it. How’s it going? Lots of good info here. Perhaps you have some sort of magic tool that helps define Twitter demographics? Also, something that speaks to the place where the echo chamber meets/influences mass market?

I guess this just proves what a small world we are in ;)

By: mrsleep

mrsleep — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:30:09 +0000

They don’t differ.
They are all asshat losers looking for a way to feel relevant and self important.

By: zrock

zrock — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:06:12 +0000

Neat!…comprehensive stats huh? I do have a profile on both facebook and myspace. I use facebook more as I can interact more with friends and there are a lot of interesting apps. I found one called textme from Mozes .This I use for my music networking, I love music and all these make me more of a facebook addict.

By: Judy

Judy — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:31:00 +0000

Great post and analysis…people are hungry for community and these sites fill that need…they will continue to grow.

By: Chris Applegate

Chris Applegate — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:22:28 +0000

Hi - great post & really illuminating. Just checking something - in the first diagram a number of “864″ means a user is 864% (i.e. 8.64 times) more likely to visit a site; in the second a number 41,615 means a user is 4,161 times (i.e. 416,150%) more likely to visit a site. Can you confirm that this is this correct, because they’re not consistent scales and it seems to me like that they should be.

By: Brick Marketing

Brick Marketing — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:25:48 +0000

We think the only reason why you could possible deem Myspace addicts as “vain” is because Facebook has no way of customizing profiles whatsoever. If Facebook allowed “skins” or “layouts”, I’m sure the same would go for them. Granted the Facebook audience is a bit more about engaging, you couldn’t quite base vanity on that due to the limitations of Facebook profiles.

By: Scranton Web Design

Scranton Web Design — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:43:36 +0000

That is a great use of stats.

By: David Brain

David Brain — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:44:38 +0000

Great post and analysis