For those of you who have been unaware of the Anonymous vs. Church of Scientology story, here’s a quick recap.

When videos of Tom Cruise speaking at a Church of Scientology function leaked onto the Internet in January they quickly became the viral topic du jour, showing up on celebrity sites and mainstream news sites alike. The tapes gave outsiders an unprecedented glimpse inside the typically private organization, and showed a fascinating side of Cruise and the Church that few have been privy to.

Church of Scientology attorneys acted quickly to have the videos removed from YouTube and other top video-sharing sites, claiming that the files had been acquired illegally and that sharing them was tantamount to distributing stolen property.

That action in turn angered some fervent critics of Scientology who claimed the Church was attempting to censor the Internet. One group of critics, calling itself “Anonymous,” issued a declaration of war on Scientology and, claiming the banner of “freedom of speech,” launched denial of service attacks on several Scientology websites (ironically trampling the Church’s freedom of speech in the process).

To get a sense of online reaction to the situation I took a look at traffic to two sites that represent the respective sides of the conflict: Scientology.org, the Church of Scientology’s homepage, and Xenu.net, the URL for Operation Clambake, a site which, though not officially linked to Anonymous, has been one of the most prominent critics of the religion. So how did the controversy affect visitation trends in January?

Visits to Scientology.org more than quadrupled in the month of January, with over 200,000 individuals visiting the site. Xenu.net also saw a bump in visitors, ending the month with a significant percentage increase, but still only managing less than half the traffic to the Scientology site.

This made me wonder if the Anonymous attacks may have backfired by generating new interest in the religion. Looking strictly at searches for the term “Scientology,” it’s possible that this is exactly what has happened.

I don’t want to get into taking sides in this debate, there’s enough of that already taking place in chat rooms and on message boards all over the web. I just wanted to see what trends are in the data surrounding the issue. I’ll leave it to you to decide what it all means.


Analyze more domains: + +

Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.

Link to This Post:     


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.
  1. Jonathan Street

    I think the people count is far from being the complete picture. I know I for one have visited the scientology site on a couple of occasions during January. Each time I spent only a few seconds there mainly to have a little laugh before moving on. The number of visits to scientology goes up but I wouldn’t say the campaign has backfired.

    If you look at the average stay you see that time spent on the site by visitors at scientology has remained static (-3%) while visitors on xenu.net spent 48% more time on the site.

    http://siteanalytics.compete.com/scientology.org+xenu.net?metric=avgStay

    The data is a little difficult to interpret though as both sites dropped in December.

    Pages/visit also does something similar - both sites increase but with xenu.net increasing faster.

  2. jonathan

    Why do you call scientology a religion ?

    It’s a sect, in the french meaning, like a “Cult” for you english-speaker !

  3. SuperFly

    Did the attempts of un-censorship from anonymous really backfire because of spikes in Scientology web traffic or was this simply a result of Tom Cruise’s ‘leaked’ videos?

    I wonder what the top search terms were around the words “Tom Cruise” during the time period. I’m willing to bet some of them were ..”Is Crazy” and ..”was way cooler in top gun”

    ~ SF ~

  4. lolwut

    you have to remember that the graph you are using is ending on jan 08 and the protests were on feb 10th 2008. Alexa (the web information company) is showing that around FEB 6th is when xenu.net was getting much more traffic then scientology.org. enturbulation.org (forum organizing the raids) has recieved MUCH more traffic then scientology.org in the past few days.

  5. Critical Thinker

    With articles and blog posts concerning the protests, as well as Google rankings putting more and more critical sites on page 1 of search results, I predict there will be exponential growth in opposition to the Church of Scientology among mainstream internet users and society at large. Never before has such a wealth of information (xenu.net, Youtube, etc.) been available into what that organization does: intimidation, suppression, human rights abuses, child neglect/abuse, subversion of the legal process, harassment, and so on. Additionally, actual Scientologist documents have recently become widely available on Youtube and photosharing sites, increasing knowledge of the odd upper-level beliefs and self-declared world-domination aspirations of the group.
    This is bound to create widespread blowback and a severe crimp in recruitment efforts for the group. Furthermore, details of how the group obtained its religious tax exemption from the IRS are forthcoming, and under review by the 9th circuit court of appeals.
    The times, they are a changing. The uncontrolled flow of info offered by the internet is bound to put an end to such shadowy dealings.

  6. Anonfollower

    I think that the people who go to the official Scientology website will be aware of the elements that don’t add up.

    search “anonfollower” on youtube.

    See you on the 15th.

    ~Anon


Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Latest Blog Posts:


Oct 6: Boxing vs MMA: Which Sport Are Fight Fans Turning To?
Oct 3: Who is the New #1 in the Banking Industry?
Oct 2: Homepage Showdown: Quality of Clicks from the Web’s Biggest Billboards
Oct 1: A New Crop of Smartphones – Something for Everyone?
Sep 30: Are Your Financials Minty Fresh?
Sep 29: QWERTY and Touchscreen: Better Together?
Sep 26: Why BankRate is so (G)RATE
Sep 25: Accountable Advertising on the Internet: A unique perspective from Avinash Kaushik
Sep 24: Compete PRO now has Referral Analytics!
Sep 23: August Online Video Market Share: Politics and the Olympics Take the Top 5 by Storm
Sep 22: Will Consumers Flip for the Newest Member of the BlackBerry Family?
Sep 19: August Search Market Share Update: Rivals Cede to Google’s Lead
Sep 18: Is the iPod Touch Really an iPod?
Sep 17: Lipstick Happens: McCain’s VP Pick Shakes up the Race, Online Too
Sep 16: Happy Birthday GM! Your Present? Volt’s Apparent Success!
Sep 15: Do Any Financial Services Marketers Really Do a Good Job in Marketing to Their Customers?
Sep 12: Are You Ready for Some Football? Not Really, but at Least My HDTV Is!
Sep 11: OTA Search Share: Expedia Leading the Way
Sep 10: August data is live – School and sports related sites soar
Sep 10: Staycation Nation: Destination Tourism at Home