Compete.com is getting a makeover!
Written by Jay Meattle (contact - e-mail) -- October 15th, 2007 | Recommend ThisCompete.com’s 1-year birthday is coming up. To celebrate, we’re giving Compete.com a makeover!
Compete.com has morphed quite a bit since launching back in November ‘06, and we realized many months back that the website’s navigation had not kept up. We’ve worked on improving this and are getting ready to release a new navigation scheme, and homepage this week.
We know change is hard, but in this case we think it is for the better :) Look out for these big changes and let us know what you think!
Preview of the new homepage:
Preview of new navigation:
Did you like that post? You'll love these.
Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.
Link to This Post:
Posted under: Compete.com Updates |
Trackback Link | Permalink | 
Get the 
October 15th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Looks really good guys. Question for you: when are you releasing UK specific data for the search phrases?
October 16th, 2007 at 2:45 am
Very attractive design
Why not offer several options for previewing and let the readers vote and critique ahead of time
October 16th, 2007 at 3:47 am
@Philip - Not this year. There are a number of people at Compete considering our options. We know the demand is there because we have a lot of international users already.
@Search Engines Web - Thanks! We’re ready to go live with this design. However, do critique when we release (probably today). As always, we’re listening and WILL iterate the design based on your feedback.
October 17th, 2007 at 2:29 am
I normally wouldn’t comment, but I think it’s a step backwards. I liked the single search box, I understand the call to action but I was able to quickly lookup a site, now I have to wait for a landing page to load and delete all the default text in the boxes to look at site stats. Besides everything for some reason appears smaller (the text boxes), the CSS is heavy and loads slowly. I don’t know guys.