Comments on: Rottentomatoes.com top 20 Movies: What people watch before they watch

By: merdiven

merdiven — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:27:42 +0000

Hi, We have been manufacturing stair. 304 merdivenci 304

By: bassan loadcell

bassan loadcell — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:23:19 +0000

hi, my name is basan.com.tr BASSAN loadcell.your wonderful blog, 168 blog. tnx. Msj number . 168

By: JanyKov

JanyKov — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:16:09 +0000

many thanks

By: bassan

bassan — Tue, 19 May 2009 17:31:43 +0000

hi, msj 123 wonderful blog 123 share

By: ELD DANISMANLIK

ELD DANISMANLIK — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:52:34 +0000

nice sharing, thanks

By: iso 9001

iso 9001 — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:24:44 +0000

good job

By: Araba Resmi

Araba Resmi — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:18:34 +0000

thanks..

By: Claude Gelinas

Claude Gelinas — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:05:58 +0000

The “TomatoMeter” is usually right.

For instance, Eragon was a “been there, seen that” movie from start to finish and the reviewers reflected that in the movie’s less than enviable score.

If democracy worked like this movie site, we wouldn’t be sitting pretty (waiting to vote -and- voice out our opinion) for four, long “political” years ; )

By: Seo Toolbar

Seo Toolbar — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:59:57 +0000

Success is promoted by Money but sometimes Money can’t bring success !

We as e-marketers follow the success (high ranked websites…) to bring money :-)

By: Max Freiert

Max Freiert — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:43:34 +0000

Scott - Great point! Marketing budget would have been a better comparison, but unfortunately that information isn’t readily available, especially across all of the film studios responsible for these top 20.

To answer your pans labyrinth question, it might be that a very small marketing budget actually enticed people to research the movie more. Pan’s Labyrinth received rave reviews, had an obscure name, and did very little in the way of marketing, so its only natural that curious people would check out a site like RottenTomatoes to learn more.

Borat was a “great success” on the internet before, during and after the movie’s release. Additionally, it’s unlikely that the movie had a large production budget, so its possible that a substantial part of the overall budget was devoted to marketing.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:25:14 +0000

To me, it seems you need to compare it to the marketing budget.

I am sure the movies budget follows very closely the total budget.

People want to know more about the most marketed movies.

Pans Labyrinth’s had no budget at all, but it was a top movie. Why is that? Same with Borat? How do you explain that?