Fantasy Football Sweeps the Nation, especially North Dakota
Written by Andy Kazeniac (contact - e-mail) -- September 5th, 2007 |
Share - Save - E-mail
Judging by the selection of fantasy football guides at a local bookstore (I found 8 magazines devoted solely to helping you in your draft) and all the spots on television, it seems that fantasy football is bigger than ever. While off-line coverage is a good indication that the game has hit the mainstream, the real scope of fantasy football can be best seen where the game is played – online.
ESPN and Yahoo! dominate the fantasy football world, with Yahoo! being the overall leader with over 135% more session since the beginning of July. The map above shows which geographical areas the traffic is coming from and is relatively in line with the U.S. population density. The ESPN and Yahoo! fantasy football traffic shows a slightly different story when indexed against the state population.
The above map shows the intensity of fantasy football participation on the two major sites by state. For example, North Dakota had the highest intensity with 185,543 sessions from a state population of 635,867 for an intensity measure of 29%. This methodology evens the playing field and eliminates the bias of population density to show the truly impassioned fantasy football states.
- Three states have three professional football teams, yet none of them finished in the top half of the state rankings in terms of intensity. New York was the highest at 29 with, followed by Florida at 38 and California at 45.
- The Colts Super Bowl run last season may have helped increase Indiana’s fantasy football intensity – coming in third behind North Dakota and Delaware.
- Wyoming ranks as the least intense fantasy football state, coming in last with only 3%.
Four of the top ten states do not have an NFL franchise, which helps show just how widespread the popularity of fantasy football has become.
Did you like that post? You'll love these.
Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.
Link to This Post:
Get the 
September 6th, 2007 at 12:03 pm
No surprise to see the Southeast with the lowest regional usage. There’s a few pro teams down here with strong followings, but this is definitely college football country. Most of the ‘fantasy’ stuff around here is college pick’ems . . . on ESPN or Yahoo. :)
When are you going to start rolling out these cool map features (and apparently the ability to compare traffic by subdomains) on the rest of Compete?
September 6th, 2007 at 5:38 pm
True very few pro teams with any major followings at all down that way.
Carmelo Lisciotto
http://www.carmelolisciotto.com
September 11th, 2007 at 4:50 pm
This is great stuff. It would be interesting to see what would happen if there was an NFL team in North Dakota. They would probably have no problem selling out but they wouldn’t have much of a TV Market. I bet a minor league football or Arena league team would do real well there.
September 25th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
People live in North Dakota????
May 19th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
hi, msj 309 wonderful blog 309 share
August 26th, 2009 at 9:38 am
hi, my name is basan.com.tr BASSAN loadcell.your wonderful blog, 222 blog. tnx. Msj number . 222
August 30th, 2009 at 9:24 am
Hi, We have been manufacturing stair. 293 merdivenci 293
November 19th, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Thank you for taking your time to read this email. My name is Kyle Bone and i am a student at the University of Southern Mississippi, and i am trying to find the data of fantasy sports participants by state. What i am trying to do is compare the information of participants to the states with and with out professional sports teams, to try and make a map to see if states with pro sports programs play more or less fantasy sports that states with out a program. I am looking for a state by state index of participants If anyone could be of any help what so ever it would be greatly appreciated. another thing is no information will go with out being cited to the fullest.