Your Searches Are Worth Billions
Written by Jeremy Crane (contact - e-mail) -- July 26th, 2007 | Recommend ThisOver the past few months there’s been a huge amount of consolidation in the online advertising world. Google acquiring Double Click (or at least trying to) for $3 billion and Microsoft acquiring aQuantive for $6 billion were the two biggest examples of this consolidation in the past few months. There are a lot of smart people coming down on both sides of the fence as to whether these are good deals for the companies in question. On the other hand everyone agrees that ad servers are incredibly valuable. DoubleClick and Atlas (aQuantive’s ad serving division) are the 800 pound gorillas in the ad server world. When you take a look at the data it starts to become pretty obvious why.
Four out of five people online in June saw a DoubleClick ad and more than four out of five saw an Atlas ad. When you consider the total ad coverage associated with these two behemoths you essentially have coverage over the entire Internet Browser Population. Considering there we’re just over 174 million people online in the US in June, that’s a lot of eyeballs. If we start talking page views then we’re talking over 20 billion ads served to people in the US by Atlas and DoubleClick in June alone.
One way that these guys try to get our attention is through search advertising. Both Atlas and DoubleClick buy sponsored search listings for their perspective clients. When you look at the volume of search referrals sent through Atlas and DoubleClick’s properties we’re looking at some pretty big numbers. Atlas refers about 2.6 million sponsored search listings per month. DoubleClick refers about 3 million sponsored search listings through its properties (including Dartsearch) each month. When you look at the top search keywords resulting in referrals through Atlas and DoubleClick it is pretty interesting to see the brands that emerge.
There are some pretty big brands, both online and offline, that are dependent upon DoubleClick and Atlas to drive search traffic to their site. Even more interesting are the opposing brands lining up behind their ad server of choice. Enterprise vs. National vs. Hertz and Hotels.com vs. Travelocity.com show up in the top 15. If you look a little deeper in to the lists you can find a competitor for nearly every other brand listed above.
Is aQuantive worth $6 billion and DoubleClick worth $3 billion? Smarter people than me seem to think so.
Did you like that post? You'll love these.
Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.
Link to This Post:
Posted under: Online Media & Search |
Trackback Link | Permalink | 
Get the 
July 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pm
Porque Compete no me analiza??
July 27th, 2007 at 4:41 pm
What does this (dependence of brands on Atlas and DoubleClick) say about how consumers use the Web? It says they use search to navigate — not necessarily to discover.
Affiliate marketing, domaining — search marketing agencies for that matter have all discovered and ‘monetized’ the fact. Where have marketers been? For how long will middle-men get to cash in on what amounts to navigational habit? As I see it, there’s a sub-economy working behind the scenes: an ‘ignorance economy’ wherein what marketers’ collectively haven’t understood has been leveraged into cash.
As well, continued dominance of these companies is threatened by Web 2.0 — namely the death of the browser and adoption of RSS/XML technologies that allow users to view the Web sans browser! Adoption of RSS has been rapid among popular hang-outs (i.e. Yahoo, MSN — virtually every major portal provides feed aggregators) and relative newcomers like Bloglines.
With Nielsen et al setting up to focus less on pageviews and more on user “attention” (i.e. length of stay on publisher sites) we’re forced to examine how today’s major players will cope.
How is Almighty Google coping? One word: Feedburner. One of their smaller yet most important acquisitions to date.
July 27th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Great comment Jeff … although I do take exception to the cough … cough … Nielsen reference. I’m pretty sure Compete was the first to coin the term Attention and launch the metric on http://www.compete.com. I won’t hold it against you that you give Nielsen credit for the move since your comment is so insightful and thought provoking.
Thanks for reading.
August 7th, 2007 at 10:20 am
Actually, Jeremy, you are 100% correct and I’m fully aware of Compete’s trailblazing. I wasn’t giving them credit for doing anything but paying attention — to the attention companies like Compete are focusing on what they’re calling “attention” ;)
November 20th, 2007 at 5:38 am
achat poker chips online
December 15th, 2007 at 5:12 am
free slots game 30 free game slots
Find free virtual casino game free casino money
December 20th, 2007 at 3:44 am
application loan online payday
Here loan till payday advance america loan payday
January 25th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
bad card credit debt uk
Fill advance cash day pay uk lowest interest credit card
February 2nd, 2008 at 2:20 am
sentenced soittoäänet
Perhaps sm liiga soittoäänet mp3 soittoäänet
February 5th, 2008 at 4:26 am
le jeu vidéo poker
Tousles free cash advance with credit card fast loan online payday
March 8th, 2008 at 3:02 pm
jugar poker omaha en linea
En crack rebel poker juego de poquer