While svelte HDTVs are flying off store shelves, their companion next generation DVD players of the rival Blu-ray and HD-DVD varieties have collected more dust than interest since their introduction last year.

Many had expected the introduction of the PS3 (which doubles as a Blu-ray player) to tip the scales resoundingly in Blu-ray’s favor. Despite claims this week of victory by Blu-ray backers, there is mounting evidence to the contrary.

While Blu-ray has received a much needed boost from the PS3, its lofty price, Xbox 360’s continued console leadership, and LG’s announcement this week of a “dual-format” player are evidence that this battle will rage on for some time.

During the last half of 2006, demand for both formats, as measured by the number of U.S. consumers shopping online for the respective stand-alone players, was virtually identical. In December, for example, 46,000 U.S. consumers shopped for a Blu-ray player while 43,000 shopped for a less-expensive HD-DVD player. Among these shoppers, roughly a quarter shopped for both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD players.

Victory in this battle was so important for Sony that it delayed the release of its PS3 for months while it sorted out Blu-ray component and manufacturing issues. Sony’s strategy ensures a Blu-ray convert for every PS3 sold, but the challenge, of course, is convincing consumers to value the added functionality enough to pay a premium to go “all-in” with Blu-ray.

Microsoft, firmly in the HD-DVD camp, now offers a HD-DVD add-on drive which, when combined with an Xbox 360, roughly matches the PS3’s functionality. Over 5 million Xbox 360’s have been sold in the U.S. since their introduction in late 2005. Microsoft is likely to cut the price of the console over the next couple of months, and if strategically warranted, could subsidize an even greater portion of the HD-DVD add-on in order to spur adoption among Xbox 360 users. While only 3% of Xbox 360 console shoppers shopped for the HD-DVD accessory in December, a price cut will undoubtedly give it a boost while making the price disparity between the Xbox 360 and the PS3 even more glaring.

LG’s unveiling of a “dual format” player at this week’s CES, and the accompanying rumors of a potential “truce” in this battle would be great news for consumers but a nightmare for Sony. If dual-format players take hold and studios continue to support only one format, PS3 owners will be stuck with a device that only works with some titles. The very Blu-ray player Sony was so determined to include in the PS3 might, in the end, render the PS3 obsolete instead.

Note: Online demand for these formats was calculated based on the monthly unique visitors to Blu-ray and HD-DVD stand-alone disc player product pages at the leading online electronics retailers.

ProfileGet SnapShots of sites mentioned in this post:


Analyze more domains: + +

Done reading? subscribe: To get an automatic feed of all future posts subscribe here, or to receive them via email enter your email address in the box in the right column.

Link to This Post:     


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.
  1. simon

    The Successors of DVD: BLU-RAY AND HD-DVD ;)
    http://www.ecomost.com/en/_Details/2007210441711980/

  2. ???

    People are stupid. By giving people a blue ray player in the form of a PS3, Sony has practically gauranteed succsess. Btw, HD-DVD are obsolete compared to blue ray, which can hold several times more data than HD-DVD.

  3. AdSense Money Maker

    AdSense Money Maker

    Do you know how to make money from AdSense automatically? You don’t!? I’ll teach you how!

  4. fersnizaly

    screw the blue ray it will be gone in 5-10 years due to pirating and limewire and bearshear and al those other free downloaders hd dvd is better because its cheaper and dosnt realy need to be pirated because the discs arnt much more than regular dvds

  5. ChRiStOpH

    i agree, this is just like the vhs vs beta back in the 80’s. hddvd will win for sure because it’s cheaper while not that inconvenient compared to stupid blu-ray. and as for what that unknown person said above, blu-ray has 50gigs as opposed to 30gigs on the hddvd which is only two thirds more space, not several times. besides, who the hell buys the movies for the special features anyway? i for one buy the movies for the movie itself.

  6. 699f6a2e2db5

    699f6a2e2db5

    699f6a2e2db5306cbe76


Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Latest Blog Posts:


Sep 8: Nordstrom Continues to Impress
Sep 5: Battle for the Online Box Office: Fandango and MovieTickets
Sep 4: July Online Video Market Share: YouTube Marches On, Crackle Gets Major Push From Minisodes
Sep 3: The “New” Facebook: Learning From Old Mistakes
Sep 2: Where Have All the Clickthroughs Gone?
Aug 29: ING DIRECT vs. E*TRADE: Seeing Inside Your Rival’s Ads
Aug 28: Interview with Presentation Zen Master Garr Reynolds
Aug 27: Guest Post: How Are Hyundai’s Strengths Transferring Across Vehicle Categories?
Aug 26: What Else are iPhone Researchers Into? Blogging and Travel Sites
Aug 25: July Search Market Share Update: Everyone Dips But Google
Aug 22: Yahoo! Takes Gold in Olympic Reach, NBC Squeaks Win in Engagement
Aug 21: Forget Bush Fatigue, Obama Fatigue is Here (To Stay?)
Aug 20: The iPhone Comes to Best Buy: Good Buy or Good-Bye for Consumers?
Aug 19: Kruger: A Battle of Might, Will… What Were We Talking About?
Aug 18: The Mass Affluent and the Economy
Aug 15: Superhero… Phones? Cell Phone Microsites Ride the Hype of Big Summer Movies
Aug 14: Borders.com Now in Control of its Own Destiny
Aug 13: Is Circuit City Making a Comeback, or is Best Buy #1 Online?
Aug 12: The Dark Knight: Is the Knight of the Box-Office Also the Knight of Online Search?
Aug 11: Priceline Guarantees Sunshine, Gets Conversion